Duke-UNC Brain Imaging and Analysis Center
BIAC Forums | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
 All Forums
 Support Forums
 Analysis Software Support
 BIAC BXH Acquisition Time Index vs. Slice Order??

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

 
Check here to subscribe to this topic.
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Jeff_Browndyke Posted - Nov 23 2014 : 4:51:02 PM
The BXH functional directory headers have information for:

<datapoints label="acquisitiontimeindex">1 18 2 19 3 20 4 21 5 22 6 23 7 24 8 25 9 26 10 27 11 28 12 29 13 30 14 31 15 32 16 33 17 34</datapoints>

<sliceorder>1,3,5,7,9,11,13,15,17,19,21,23,25,27,29,31,33,2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20,22,24,26,28,30,32,34</sliceorder>

Does anyone know which is the proper set to use for SPM slice-time correction?
1   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
syam.gadde Posted - Nov 23 2014 : 6:31:52 PM
Not that familiar with spm but it's more than likely the <sliceorder> field will be the appropriate one. The two fields are essentially functions mapping slice indices in volume order to acquisition order, or vice-versa.

BIAC Forums © 2000-2010 Brain Imaging and Analysis Center Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.36 seconds. Snitz Forums 2000