Duke-UNC Brain Imaging and Analysis Center
BIAC Forums | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
 All Forums
 Support Forums
 Analysis Software Support
 FSL second level analyses

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

 
Check here to subscribe to this topic.
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Dichter Posted - Aug 08 2007 : 7:50:50 PM
Just came across this in today's FSL Archives:

http://jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind0708&L=FSL&P=R9699

The recomendation is to use FE (rather than FLAME) for second-level within-subject cross-session modelling.
3   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
syam.gadde Posted - Aug 10 2007 : 10:51:04 AM
avwmaths++ has a few more operations, but they're about the same.
vinod Posted - Aug 10 2007 : 10:41:42 AM
Is there a difference between avwmaths and avwmaths++ programs?
vinod Posted - Aug 08 2007 : 9:25:21 PM
Its great that they have finally 'officially' accepted it. Makes more sense to do so and thats what some of us have already been doing.

BIAC Forums © 2000-2010 Brain Imaging and Analysis Center Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.31 seconds. Snitz Forums 2000