Duke-UNC Brain Imaging and Analysis Center
BIAC Forums | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
 All Forums
 Support Forums
 Experimental Control
 button responses with cigal

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

 
Check here to subscribe to this topic.
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
debra.cooper Posted - Mar 14 2007 : 3:54:25 PM
I ran a subject yesterday using CIGAL and instructed the subject only the left two buttons were supposed to be pressed. After each run, the button responses were combinations of presses from buttons 1, 2, 4, 6, 16, and 18. I tested the subject's button presses and only the first two buttons flashed whenever she pressed them. I was wondering what the button reponses 4, 6, 16, and 18 are referring to.
3   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
jim.voyvodic Posted - Oct 04 2007 : 4:26:40 PM
The variable results appear to be because the button box is sending spurious 16 codes at a fairly high rate. The 1 and 2 buttons are coded as 2 and 4, so presumably those values make sense. The 16's are button 4 signals coming in on their own, while the 18's and 20's are button 4 signals coming while button 2 or 4 is pressed (the values simply add).

So, there is apparently a hardware problem (an unstable button or wire) causing the funny code values. We'll get somebody to look into that.

For the scans you already have you should be able to filter all the 16 transition signals out of our behavioral data using the response log data stored in CIGAL's 'pdigm' output file. If you need help on that please come see me.

Jim
felder Posted - Oct 04 2007 : 12:13:27 PM
I had a similar issue yesterday at the 4T. The participant was using the 4-button box (with joystick on top), and was instructed to press only two buttons.

During the 4th run cigal indicated:
Button 2 - pressed 21x
Button 4 - pressed 140x
Button 16- pressed 40x
Button 18- pressed 4x
Button 20- pressed 34x

And during the 5th run:
Button 2 - pressed 8x
Button 4 - pressed 36x
Button 16- pressed 212x
Button 18- pressed 23x
Button 20- pressed 170x

The .out files are not exactly consistent with what cigal indicates.

Any ideas?
jim.voyvodic Posted - Mar 14 2007 : 4:04:36 PM
Each button box generates its own response values for each button. The pattern you describe suggests that this was a binary-coded box that sends 1,2,4,8, or 16 for each button, but for some reason you are getting combinations 6 and 18. Which button box were you using and on which scanner? This pattern almost makes sense, but not if you were using the normal joystick box.
If you could send me CIGAL's "pdigm" output file for a problem run I could probably figure out what was happening.

Jim

BIAC Forums © 2000-2010 Brain Imaging and Analysis Center Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.3 seconds. Snitz Forums 2000